What Is Considered Common Law in Ontario?
In Ontario, you’re considered to be in a common law relationship if:
- You’ve been living together for at least three years in a romantic (conjugal) relationship, or
- You’ve been living together for less than three years but have a child together, either by birth or adoption, and are in a relationship of permanence.
This three-year rule is crucial because it determines eligibility for many legal rights, including spousal support. However, property division does not follow the same rules as for married couples, leaving common law partners in a more precarious legal position.
What Is a Conjugal Relationship in Canada?
A conjugal relationship involves more than cohabitation. It includes emotional and physical intimacy, shared responsibilities like household duties and financial management, and presenting yourselves as a couple to the outside world.
The distinction between a conjugal and roommate-like relationship becomes critical in determining whether common law status applies.
Legal Differences Between Common Law Marriage and Legal Marriage in Ontario
While common law relationships and marriages often resemble each other in daily life, Ontario law treats them differently.
Key Differences:
Property Division:
- Married couples divide assets through equalization of net family property under the Family Law Act.
- Common law partners keep assets in their name, unless legal claims like resulting trusts or unjust enrichment are successfully proven.
Exclusive Possession of the Matrimonial Home:
- Married spouses have equal rights to the matrimonial home.
- Common law partners have no automatic right to exclusive possession unless they establish a legal claim.
Inheritance Rights:
- Married spouses inherit under intestacy laws if their partner dies without a will.
- Common law partners are excluded and must be explicitly named in a will.
These legal disparities highlight the importance of understanding your rights and seeking legal advice if you are in a common law relationship.
Rights At Common Law Separation
The common law spouses have various rights upon separation, some of which are discussed below.
Exclusive Possession of the Matrimonial House
In both formal marriages and common-law relationships, the question of exclusive possession of the shared residence is a pivotal consideration during separation. Section 24 of the Family Law Act grants the court the authority to provide exclusive possession based on factors such as the best interests of the children, irrespective of the formal nature of the relationship. Notably, the rights regarding the matrimonial home may be less defined compared to property owned by married couples. While the act permits common-law spouses to seek exclusive possession, the process and criteria differ, marking an initial distinction in the legal treatment of property rights between the two relationship types.
Division Of Property
The division of property in the absence of a formal marriage contract involves a meticulous examination of shared assets and debts. Unlike married couples who have an automatic right to equalize their net family property, common-law partners must navigate a less structured legal landscape. Clear agreements or legal interventions aid to ensure an equitable division of property for common-law spouses.
Property division is one of the most complex aspects of common law separations. Unlike married couples, who benefit from equalization of property, common law partners in Ontario face unique challenges:
Ownership Determines Rights:
- Common law partners only retain ownership of property in their name.
- Jointly owned assets are shared equally.
Constructive and Resulting Trusts:
- Partners can claim an interest in property through doctrines like constructive trusts or resulting trusts.
Matrimonial Home Exclusion:
- Common law partners have no automatic claim to the shared home unless they can prove significant contributions.
These distinctions make property disputes a frequent issue in common law separations.
Equalization Of Net Family Property
The equalization of net family property, a central tenet of marital divorce under Section 5(1) of the FLA, is not directly applicable to common-law couples. While married spouses are entitled to an automatic equalization of their net family property upon divorce, common-law partners do not benefit from this streamlined process. Instead, they may need to pursue legal mechanisms such as constructive trust claims to achieve a fair distribution, highlighting a notable divergence in the rights of common-law and married spouses.
Child Support
The determination of child support payments in common law marriage follows FLA guidelines, primarily relying on the income of the paying parent to ensure a consistent standard of living for the child. The overarching principle of the best interests of the child governs this process, taking into account factors such as the child’s specific needs and the standard of living during the parents’ relationship. Importantly, child support rights and obligations are uniformly applicable to both common-law and married couples, emphasizing equality for children irrespective of their parents’ marital status. In common-law relationships, enforcement mechanisms, including wage garnishments, property seizure, and filing a notice of default, provide avenues to ensure that child support orders are effectively implemented. This underscores the importance of comprehending the unique considerations within common-law unions and establishing robust enforcement measures to guarantee the ongoing financial support crucial for the child’s well-being.
Spousal Support
Spousal support considerations apply universally, encompassing both common-law and married relationships. However, the formalities of marriage provide a more structured legal framework for determining spousal support in divorces. While common-law spouses have the same rights to spousal support, they may need to navigate a less defined legal landscape compared to their married counterparts.
The spousal support determinations are guided by several key factors:
- Length of the Relationship: The duration of the relationship is a crucial factor. In Ontario, a longer relationship may result in a lengthier period of spousal support.
- Roles and Contributions: The FLA acknowledges the various roles each party played during the relationship. Contributions, whether financial or non-financial, are considered when determining the need for and amount of spousal support.
- Economic Consequences: The economic consequences of the separation agreement, including disparities in income and the standard of living, are fundamental considerations.
The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG) provide a framework for determining payment amounts, but courts often tailor decisions to individual circumstances.
Child Custody And Access
Within common-law separations in Ontario, child custody and access arrangements are governed by Section 20 of the Children’s Law Reform Act. This pivotal provision places the best interests of the child at the forefront, considering factors such as emotional and physical well-being, the child’s views, parental abilities, and relevant circumstances. This Court has the authority to determine various types of custody, including sole, joint, or shared custody, while also ensuring access rights for the non-custodial parent. The emphasis on flexibility and a case-specific approach underscores the tailoring of custody and access arrangements to each family’s unique circumstances, all with the overarching goal of safeguarding the well-being of the child.
Protecting Your Rights in a Common Law Relationship in Ontario
Safeguarding your interests during a common law relationship is essential to avoid disputes upon separation.
Cohabitation Agreements
- Clearly outline financial responsibilities and property ownership to prevent future conflicts.
Financial Documentation
- Maintain detailed records of contributions to shared property or assets.
Consult a Lawyer
- Seek legal guidance to understand your rights and obligations fully.
Common Misconceptions About Common Law Relationships in Ontario
Many people misunderstand the legal implications of common law relationships in Ontario, leading to confusion and unmet expectations. Below are some of the most prevalent misconceptions clarified:
1. “Common law is the same as marriage.”
This is perhaps the most widespread myth. While common law relationships may look like marriages in daily life, the legal rights and obligations differ significantly:
- Property Division: Married couples follow the equalization of net family property under the Family Law Act, while common law partners must prove ownership or contribution to claim property rights.
- Inheritance: Common law partners are not entitled to inherit their partner’s estate unless explicitly named in a will, unlike married spouses.
- Matrimonial Home: Married couples have equal rights to the matrimonial home, while common law partners do not.
2. “Living together for one year makes you common law in Ontario.”
This belief is incorrect under Ontario law. The timeline for being considered common law is three years of continuous cohabitation in a conjugal relationship or having a child together in a relationship of permanence. The one-year rule applies to some tax and immigration matters but not family law.
3. “Common law partners automatically share assets.”
Unlike married couples, common law partners do not automatically share assets acquired during the relationship. Ownership remains with the person whose name is on the title or account. To claim a share of property, the non-owner must prove their financial or non-financial contributions through legal doctrines like unjust enrichment or constructive trust.
4. “Common law relationships don’t have spousal support obligations.”
Common law partners may be eligible for spousal support if they meet the criteria under Ontario law, such as three years of cohabitation or having a child together. Courts consider factors like financial dependency, career sacrifices, and the length of the relationship when determining support.
5. “If my partner dies, I automatically inherit as a common law spouse.”
This is a dangerous misconception. In Ontario, intestacy laws (rules for when someone dies without a will) do not recognize common law partners as heirs. If your partner dies without naming you in their will, you will not inherit their estate. To secure inheritance rights, a valid will is essential.
6. “Being in a common law relationship gives me rights to my partner’s pension.”
Access to a partner’s pension depends on the specific plan and whether you are named as a beneficiary. Unlike married couples, common law partners are not automatically entitled to share in pension benefits upon separation or death unless specified in the plan or through a court order.
7. “I can stay in the family home because we lived there together.”
For common law partners, the family home does not carry the same protections as for married couples. Ownership determines who retains rights to the home. A non-owning partner must prove significant contributions to claim a share or negotiate exclusive possession in court.
8. “Tax laws treat common law couples the same as family law does.”
While the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) recognizes common law relationships for tax purposes after 12 months of cohabitation, this recognition does not extend to family law matters like property division. It’s crucial to differentiate between tax and family law when understanding your rights.
9. “Common law relationships don’t require legal agreements.”
Without a cohabitation agreement, common law partners are left to navigate complex legal doctrines in the event of a separation. This can lead to lengthy court battles over property, spousal support, or debts. A cohabitation agreement clarifies expectations and protects both partners.
10. “Once we break up, I have no legal obligations to my partner.”
Even after a common law relationship ends, one partner may be required to provide spousal support if eligibility criteria are met. Additionally, if children are involved, child support and custody arrangements will need to be addressed, often requiring legal intervention.
Why These Misconceptions Matter
Understanding the truth about common law relationships in Ontario can help couples make informed decisions about their future. For example, assuming automatic inheritance or shared property rights can leave one partner vulnerable in a separation or after a partner’s death. Consulting a family lawyer to clarify rights and obligations is an essential step in protecting your interests.
Steps to Take During a Common Law Separation in Ontario
When a common law relationship ends, following a structured approach can protect your legal and financial interests:
Understand Your Legal Status
Verify whether your relationship qualifies as common law under Ontario law.
Document Contributions
Create a detailed record of assets, debts, and financial or non-financial contributions to shared property.
Consider Mediation or Arbitration
Resolve disputes amicably without going to court, especially for matters like child custody or spousal support.
Seek Legal Advice
A lawyer can guide you through property division, spousal support claims, and custody arrangements.
Get Help From a Common Law Divorce Lawyer
When navigating the complexities of common-law separation, seeking professional legal assistance is crucial at various junctures. If you find yourself contemplating separation, it’s advisable to seek legal advice and consult with a family law attorney early in the process. Their guidance can provide clarity on your rights, potential outcomes, and the steps involved in the separation. Legal assistance becomes especially crucial when addressing matters like property division, spousal support, and child custody, ensuring that your interests are safeguarded and the best interests of any children involved are prioritized.
Moreover, seeking help promptly can facilitate smoother negotiations and, if necessary, legal proceedings. As emotions run high during separations, having a legal advocate provides a rational and objective perspective, helping you make informed decisions that will shape your future post-separation. Whether you are at the initial stages of contemplating separation or facing challenges in ongoing negotiations, timely legal support is instrumental in achieving equitable and favorable outcomes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the landscape of common-law separation in Ontario is marked by both shared principles and distinctive challenges. From the less structured division of property to the absence of automatic equalization, common-law spouses navigate a legal terrain that demands careful consideration and proactive legal action. Understanding these differences is paramount for individuals in common-law relationships, underscoring the need for legal counsel to effectively navigate the complexities of family law in Ontario.
At Kozyrev Law, we recognize the intricate nature of common-law separation in Ontario and the unique challenges it poses. Our commitment is to provide comprehensive legal support tailored to the individual needs of our clients. Whether you are dealing with property division, child custody, or spousal support matters, our experienced team is dedicated to guiding you through the complexities of the legal process.
FAMILY LAWYER SERVING ALL OVER GTA
